🔗 Share this article

You're probably familiar with the Hitchcock classic, The Silence of the Lambs, and the horror staple. Perhaps you've also explored the original novels that inspired the first two films. Now prepare to meet the man who inspired Norman Bates, the serial killer, and Leatherface. The infamous Ed Gein!

The first two seasons of the series in question centered around the Milwaukee monster – a name with widespread notoriety. Then came the Menendez brothers – a more niche story for enthusiasts of the genre. Attention now shifts to the Butcher of Plainfield. Although he doesn't possess the brand recognition of other notorious killers, and only killed two people, his grave desecrations and gruesome creativity with female corpses have left a lasting mark. Even now, any film or show featuring mutilated bodies, flayed skin, or skin-based artifacts probably owes a debt to Gein's exploits from many decades past.

A Dismissive Approach

Is my tone too casual? This appears to be the intended style of the production team. It's uncommon to witness a drama that dwells so eagerly on the worst depredations an individual – and mankind – can commit. This includes a significant plotline devoted to the horrors of the Third Reich, presented with minimal moral context.

Effective Pacing and Narrative

Structurally and stylistically, the series excels. The rhythm is well-maintained, and the skillful blending of different timelines is executed brilliantly. Viewers witness Charlie Hunnam as the killer in action – the murders, tomb violations, and assembling his collection. Simultaneously, the present-day narrative follows Alfred Hitchcock, Robert Bloch, and Anthony Perkins as they craft the iconic film from Bloch's Gein-inspired novel. The blending of the real – his devout parent and his obsession with female doppelgangers – and the unreal – lurid portrayals of the Buchenwald criminal and SS officer gatherings – is executed proficiently.

The Glaring Omission

What it lacks, and unforgivably so, is ethical commentary or meaningful analysis to offset the lingering, loving shots of his immoral deeds. The series portrays his rich inner world and frames him as a man at the mercy of his controlling parent and an accomplice with dark interests. The underlying suggestion seems to be: How could a mentally ill man resist? In one scene, the novelist theorizes that without exposure to photographs, Gein would have remained a small-town simpleton.

Breaking from Past Success

You could argue that a Ryan Murphy production – renowned for glossy, high-camp style – is an unlikely source for profound human insight. But previous works like The People v OJ Simpson offered brilliant commentary on media and justice. The Assassination of Gianni Versace explored fame and culture. Impeachment scrutinized systemic sexism. Thus, it is possible, and Murphy has done it.

The Final Verdict

Yet not in this case. This installment feels like an exploitation of a lesser-known criminal case. It demands sympathy for the individual responsible without offering genuine insight into his transformation. Aside from the reductive "devout parent" explanation, there is no attempt to comprehend the origins or prevent future cases. This is merely voyeuristic pandering to the basest instincts of viewers. The Nazi scenes do have excellent cinematography, admittedly.